In September 2018, a five-judge Constitution bench, by a 4:1 majority verdict, lifted the ban that prevented women between ...

Recognising that denominational practices may come under judicial scrutiny, the Supreme Court on Friday observed that judges ...

Supreme Court’s second day of hearing on Sabarimala case was dominated by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s arguments.

Chief Justice Surya Kant remarked that perhaps the most difficult task for the court is facing is how to declare that the ...

The court highlighted the balance between judicial restraint and faith in Sabarimala hearings, discussing the limits of judicial review on religious practices.

Observing that denominational practices can be subject matter of judicial scrutiny, the Supreme Court on Friday said that judges must rise above personal religious beliefs and be guided by freedom of ...

The Supreme Court of India on Friday was told that clear constitutional principles must be laid down to determine freedom of religion, rather than deciding such issues on a case-by-case basis.

The Supreme Court’s nine-judge Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, continued hearings on the Sabarimala ...

Freedom of religion or belief is a fundamental human right that protects the practice of any or no religion. It ensures ...

On the fifth day of hearing in the Sabarimala review pleas case, the Supreme Court’s nine-judge Constitution Bench made a ...

A secular court cannot determine whether a religious practice amounts to superstition, the Central government told the ...

Supreme Court emphasises restraint in religious matters, cautioning against diluting core practices while hearing ...